Currently reading: Average speed cameras in 20mph zones

Average speed cameras will be used to enforce a proposed 20mph limit on urban roads

Motorists face 20mph speed limits on urban roads, enforced with average speed cameras, if new rules proposed by the Government get the green light.

The proposed restrictions are part of new road safety legislation intended to cut road deaths by a third over the next decade. Variable speed limits will be introduced on main roads near schools, with digital signs instructing drivers to reduce their speed.

Average speed cameras, commonly used on motorways, will enforce the 20mph restrictions instead of speed humps. The Home Office is expected to approve the use of average speed cameras in urban zones within the next few months.

A consultation document on this new road safety strategy will be published before the end of this year which will set out tough measures and specific targets for reducing road deaths.

Along with the widespread 20mph restrictions in town a lower drink-drive limit is also being proposed in the Government dossier, along with six penalty points for seriously breaking the speed limit and for not wearing seatbelts.

Although road deaths have fallen by 35 percent since 2006, Jim Fitzpatrick, the Road Safety Minister, told The Times, “We could reduce crashes still further with the help of more 20mph zones”. He pointed towards Sweden’s “Vision Zero” system, which rejects the idea that some roads deaths are always inevitable accidents. “We want to get back to the top (of the road safety league),” Fitzpatrick said.

Studies on the benefit of 20mph zones are being hurried through by the Department for Transport in order to persuade local councils to adopt the proposals. The DfT is also developing cheaper speed limit signs to reduce the logistical cost of implementing new 20mph restrictions on roads.

Join our WhatsApp community and be the first to read about the latest news and reviews wowing the car world. Our community is the best, easiest and most direct place to tap into the minds of Autocar, and if you join you’ll also be treated to unique WhatsApp content. You can leave at any time after joining - check our full privacy policy here.

Mark Tisshaw

mark-tisshaw-autocar
Title: Editor

Mark is a journalist with more than a decade of top-level experience in the automotive industry. He first joined Autocar in 2009, having previously worked in local newspapers. He has held several roles at Autocar, including news editor, deputy editor, digital editor and his current position of editor, one he has held since 2017.

From this position he oversees all of Autocar’s content across the print magazine, autocar.co.uk website, social media, video, and podcast channels, as well as our recent launch, Autocar Business. Mark regularly interviews the very top global executives in the automotive industry, telling their stories and holding them to account, meeting them at shows and events around the world.

Mark is a Car of the Year juror, a prestigious annual award that Autocar is one of the main sponsors of. He has made media appearances on the likes of the BBC, and contributed to titles including What Car?Move Electric and Pistonheads, and has written a column for The Sun.

Join the debate

Comments
13
Add a comment…
neil.beckingham 20 May 2008

Re: Average speed cams in 20mph zones

phenergn wrote:
I'm all for the government spending more on useful things (road building) by spending less on useless things (TV adverts to make people eat 5 portions of fruit a day). But if you are going to cry "More govenment spending" at the same time as "less taxes" it needs to be quantified with some form of constructive suggestion.

You miss my point and then make it yourself - they should spend money on the right things.

Government should get their priorities right and stop trying to con us. Money does need spending on improving road surfaces in the interests of safety and they raise enough of it from the motorist in all kinds of ways to do the job many times over.

It is extremely hypocritical of the Government to use safety and green issues as the smoke screen for more revenue raising - especially when the revenue raised is not directed to address those areas.

It probably doesn't help that they are divorced from reality and only take advice from pressure groups as opposed to those operating in the real world. See last week's Autocar on the many advantages of methanol over hydrogen for a real life example.

ordinary bloke 19 May 2008

Re: Average speed cams in 20mph zones

pippippip wrote:

Please bear with me while I bend over for my next shafting!

When will it end?  

It will only end when a) this particular government is voted out and/or b) when ordinary people with what you and I call "common sense" get elected to parliament instead of the "political elite" who are there now, this applies to both New Labour, Conservatives and LibDems. Until the initiative is taken to roll back "Big Government" and allow local communities to govern more of what goes on in their own areas we will continue to suffer under the rule of highly paid politicians whose existance can only be justified by enacting more laws. We have got to get to the situation where being an MP, local councillor etc is NOT a career that can be pursued from when you leave full time education or complete proffessional training but is something you do in addition to a career or take up halfway through your working life when you have experience of the real world.

ordinary bloke 19 May 2008

Re: Average speed cams in 20mph zones

Autocar wrote:
The proposed restrictions are part of new road safety legislation intended to cut road deaths by a third over the next decade. Variable speed limits will be introduced on main roads near schools, with digital signs instructing drivers to reduce their speed.
Yet another government initiative that they hope will hit the headlines to draw attention away from the real issues that they should be tackling (such as better driver education and putting more traffic officers on the roads etc etc) and another enforcement method that is indiscriminatory and just intended to extract more money from the motorist or increase the number of drivers banned so that Government can point to those numbers as evidence of the initiative's success. I cannot say that I disagree with 20mph limits outside schools (if only to help us avoid hitting the Mum's in their 4WDs who step into the road to open car doors without looking or double park without regard to anyone else) but any good driver won't be doing 30mph outside a school whilst kids are around in any case, they know that the speed limits posted are maximums, not obligatory. Just don't get me started on the impossibility of reducing road casualties to anywhere approaching zero, unless of course you want to stop all road traffic and move the country back to the dark ages................oh sorry, I forgot, that what this Government's doing already......