8

EV-agnostic Japanese giant’s bZ4X electric SUV spawns a smaller but confusingly named offspring

While it’s hard to keep up with Kia’s relentless launch schedule (there appears to be a new, differently numbered EV every week), Toyota takes things more steadily.

Its approach has the slow but relentless momentum that comes with being the world’s largest car maker. And with momentum also comes inertia – and that complicates changes of direction, in particular the one needed to do electric cars well.

Toyota loves its hybrids but has been very slow to come up with the EVs that it does need in Europe. The new Toyota C-HR+ is only its second mainstream EV, after the bZ4X. There is also the Urban Cruiser, but that’s a Suzuki underneath.

Didn’t Toyota already have a C-HR? Well, yes: the regular C-HR is its Volkswagen T-Roc- and Nissan Qashqai-sized, sensible but supposedly stylish hybrid SUV. The ‘+’ in the new car's name indicates that it’s the completely unrelated electric equivalent of roughly the same size – obvs. At least with a new Kia, Hyundai or VW, the name gives you a good idea of what powers it and where it sits in the range…

Advertisement

DESIGN & STYLING

7
Toyota C HR review 2026 002

Instead of being an electric version of the C-HR, the C-HR+ is actually a shortened bZ4X – not unlike the way that the Skoda Elroq is a shortened Enyaq. That means it gets all the same improvements as the recently updated version of its sister model.

Put it next to a bZ4X and there are more visual differences than there are between the Skoda siblings – particularly the C-HR+’s kinked shoulder line and round wheel-arch trims. There’s a lot going on with the design (busy surfacing, a ‘coupé’ roofline and a ducktail spoiler), yet all together it manages to look not particularly distinctive.

‘C-HR’ isn’t just a random set of letters and punctuation. When the original came out, Toyota said it stood for Coupé High Rider. File with Midship Runabout…

Peculiarly, despite being the cheaper, smaller model, the C-HR+ has a bigger battery option than the recently updated bZ4X. The entry-level battery is the same: a 57.7kWh (total capacity) pack that comes with a single 165bhp motor and, one imagines, will have limited popularity in the UK.

The long-range option is where it’s at: it has a 77kWh pack (rather than bZ4X’s 73kWh), which, in combination with the single 221bhp front motor, gives it 378 miles of range, or 350 miles with the 20in wheels that most people will probably pick. That’s more than the Elroq 85, despite having a smaller battery. 

A dual-motor version with 338bhp exists, but it won't be offered in the UK.

A maximum DC charging speed of 150kW looks a bit weedy in the bZ4X when compared with the Hyundai Ioniq 5, but it's perfectly acceptable here in this lower segment.

INTERIOR

7
Toyota C HR review 2026 012

Inside, it’s all very bZ4X. If you’re being charitable, you’d say it feels robust. The dashboard and door cards are composed of Toyota’s trademark blend of 11 textures of grey rubber, which doesn’t feel cheap but is far from upmarket. The centre console ticks all the practicality boxes, including the lack of fingerprint-prone surfaces, but goodness it’s dull.

Not to sound ungrateful, but the area in which Toyota has tried to be a bit zany hasn’t really worked. Like on the bZ4X, it does the Peugeot-style thing of having a high-set instrument cluster with a small steering wheel. While I didn’t have any trouble seeing the driver display, it’s still a compromised set-up that doesn’t address any unsolved problems. To grab the steering wheel and still rest your elbows on the armrests means doing a sort of chicken dance.

Toyota's press-and-turn drive selector is unusual but easier to use without looking and more satisfying than the more common toggle switches.

Otherwise, the driving position is good: it’s fairly high up, and Toyota’s seats are typically superb. The ultra-soft microsuede upholstery is pleasant, but again, did it need to be this grey?

The big infotainment touchscreen is crisp, responsive and generally logical, if a little basic – which suits a Toyota pretty well.

Space in the back is slightly down on the Elroq, with a fairly high floor.

Its 452 litres of boot volume is pretty good, if still down on that pesky Skoda.

ENGINES & PERFORMANCE

8
Toyota C HR review 2026 021

You can trust modern Toyotas to feel pretty well put-together to drive, and this one is no different. Accelerator and brake pedals are nicely progressive, and paddles let you vary the amount of lift-off regeneration, stopping short of a proper one-pedal drive mode.

Toyota’s use of an EV-only platform is reflected in the models’ relatively light kerb weights: around 1850kg and a shade under 100kg more for models with the larger battery.

The C-HR+ feels brisk car in any guise. Our the single-motor long-range car can run a decent 0-62mph sprint in 7.6sec but feels quicker than that, because of the way electric motors deliver maximum torque from standstill.

We did try the dual-motor version on an international event, and it's even quicker. The C-HR+ just isn't that kind of car, though, so it's no great loss that the UK isn't getting the fast one.

RIDE & HANDLING

8
Toyota C HR review 2026 022

The C-HR+ left us rather cold when we drove the four-wheel-drive version abroad, but a single-motor car in the UK impressed us more. 

The car feels comfortable, taut, well built and stable on British back roads, with a smooth if not exactly soft ride quality. Its steering lacks a little sharpness but there’s still an excellent feeling of directional stability and a hint of throttle steer adjustability in corners, if you’ve troubled to dial in some regen braking.

The C-HR+ rides on Bridgestone Alenza tyres, which rarely make for the most incisively handling cars.

The C-HR+ is a car you can definitely enjoy driving, which is both Toyota's claim and a must in this sophisticated class.

MPG & RUNNING COSTS

8
Toyota C HR review 2026 001

Toyota’s big selling point has long been the ownership experience, and that ought to be the case for the C-HR+ as well. Reliability tends to be strong, there’s the potential of a 10-year warranty and the C-HR+ lets you easily check the battery health: there’s a screen in the driver display that tells you what percentage of the original battery capacity remains.

Real-world efficiency ought to be another strong point, but we would need more time in a single-motor car to come to a definitive verdict. Toyota claims 4.6mpkWh, though, which is promising. On our initial drive of the dual-motor version, efficiency was fairly disappointing, at 3.0mpkWh.

As usual, Toyota's 10-year warranty comes with the caveat that you need to visit a dealership every year, which might seem a little excessive with an EV.

Prices are looking quite competitive, in part thanks to the UK government's Electric Car Grant. The standard-range Icon model costs £32,995, but the mid-range Design is where it's at: at £36,150, it's usefully cheaper than the Elroq and Kia EV5 and only slightly more than the smaller Kia EV3. For £40,150, the Excel adds bigger wheels, 22kW three-phase charging, electric seat adjustment, some additional ADAS and one or two other things.

VERDICT

Toyota C HR review 2026 025

Toyota still seems in catch-up mode when it comes to EVs. With the C-HR+, it's not moving any boundaries, but at least it is finally closing the distance to the front of the pack. It's pleasant to drive and use, comfortable, well-priced and decent rangey.

It's also the sort of car that’s likely to give several years of uneventful service with few annoyances, in a way that the Jeep Compass might not. It does risk getting lost in a sea of similar rivals, though.

Illya Verpraet

Illya Verpraet Road Tester Autocar
Title: Road Tester

As a road tester, Illya drives everything from superminis to supercars, and writes reviews and comparison tests, while also managing the magazine’s Drives section. Much of his time is spent wrangling the data logger and wielding the tape measure to gather the data for Autocar’s in-depth instrumented road tests.

He loves cars that are fun and usable on the road – whether piston-powered or electric – or just cars that are very fit for purpose. When not in test cars, he drives an R53-generation Mini Cooper S or a 1990 BMW 325i Touring.

Steve Cropley

Steve Cropley Autocar
Title: Editor-in-chief

Steve Cropley is the oldest of Autocar’s editorial team, or the most experienced if you want to be polite about it. He joined over 30 years ago, and has driven many cars and interviewed many people in half a century in the business. 

Cropley, who regards himself as the magazine’s “long stop”, has seen many changes since Autocar was a print-only affair, but claims that in such a fast moving environment he has little appetite for looking back. 

He has been surprised and delighted by the generous reception afforded the My Week In Cars podcast he makes with long suffering colleague Matt Prior, and calls it the most enjoyable part of his working week.