From £39,8957

The ZR-V is a vertically stretched Civic for the fiercely contested, hybrid-powered family SUV class

The Honda ZR-V may not be the best-known Honda model, but it’s made a telling difference to its corporate fortunes.

It became one of Honda UK's top three best-selling models in its first full calendar year on sale, 2024, returning the company to the right side of 30,000 annual units for the first time this decade.

That’s mostly because it fills a gap in a popular market segment for compact SUVs. And yet it doesn’t do so conventionally, which may be why the Honda badge on its nose seems like such a good fit.

The car presents a slightly lower-slung, ‘all-road estate’ type of alternative to the likes of the Hyundai TucsonVolkswagen Tiguan and Peugeot 3008, then. It’s a little less boxy-looking, for those who remain on the fence about SUV aesthetics but like their convenience and practicality, and its dynamic priorities are all about comfort, efficiency and ease of use.

Advertisement

DESIGN & STYLING

7
honda zr v review 2023 02

The ZR-V ostensibly fills the space that the Honda CR-V vacated when it moved up into bigger SUV territory in 2022. Closely related to the Civic, it’s broadly the same length as the big hatchback, at a little over 4.5 metres, but has a bigger boot, a taller roofline and a higher-set driving position and uses the same 2.0-litre, front-wheel drive, petrol-electric e:HEV hybrid powertrain.

The naturally aspirated, four-cylinder Atkinson-cycle petrol engine produces 141bhp - but it mainly serves to spin a generator and to generate power for the car’s main 181bhp, 232lb ft electric motor - buffering energy in and out of a 1.05kWh lithium ion battery carried under the boot floor. Most of the time the engine doesn’t drive the wheels directly, but at a motorway cruise a clutch in the transaxle can close to connect it to the front wheels through an overdrive gear.

The key thing to note about Honda’s particular hybrid transmission is that, because the engine isn’t physically connected to the wheels most of the time, the software can make it do whatever it wants. When it’s not off or physically driving the wheels, it can rev as if it’s pretending to be connected to the wheels, in order to deliver more of an intuitive performance feel (when all it’s really doing is generating power) or instead hold a set number of revs to charge the battery.

It sounds like quite a complicated system, but it doesn’t make the ZR-V particularly heavy. It’s claimed to weigh a little under 1600kg in entry-level Elegance trim, which is about 100kg less than an equivalent Hyundai Tucson and only about 50kg heavier than the mechanically simpler Volkswagen Tiguan 1.5 eTSI.

The ZR-V is front-driven only, with strut-type front suspension and a multi-link rear axle, although Honda claims that its at least relatively low centre of gravity works in its favour on both ride and handling.

INTERIOR

7

The ZR-V departs more from the template set by the Civic mostly on the inside - if only a little. 

The dashboard has the same design, featuring a horizontal strip of air vents - and the clicky physical buttons and dials for the climate control are as welcome as ever. The 9.0in touchscreen for the infotainment isn’t the crispest or most generously sized, and its factory sat-nav system isn’t especially clear, but shortcut buttons and wireless smartphone mirroring mean it’s largely simple and easy to use.

The cabin materials have had a gentle quality uplift from the Civic's, however, with more soft-touch padding on the doors and a more sculpted centre console with a little storage underneath it (unlike with the Civic, there won’t be a manual version of the ZR-V sold anywhere in the world, so no space needs to be reserved for a shift linkage).

The ZR-V also has metal paddles behind the steering wheel, used for swapping brake regeneration levels, which is a first in a Honda since the iconic NSX. Now that’s some serious pub trivia.

The one thing sticking out as a little odd is the driving position. It’s the same as in the Civic, just slightly higher-set. The Civic sits you low, with your legs outstretched, in a comfortable seat with a good amount of adjustment. That’s great for a hatchback, but a lot of people buy SUVs for the slightly more upright, bent-legged seating position that’s easier to access and affords better visibility. So it feels a bit as if the ZR-V is trying to please the people who prefer a hatchback anyway. This could be a big strength for some buyers but a negative for others.

Rear cabin space is generous, with good leg room and head room, even for taller adults, and a very shallow centre tunnel. The same grade of materials as in the front is used in the rear and there are two USB ports and air-con vents, so the rear passengers won’t feel like they've ended up in the cheap seats.

The boot, by contrast, is rather small for the class. The ZR-V’s 380-litre capacity is down quite significantly on the hybrid versions of the Kia Sportage (587 litres) and Nissan Qashqai (504) and even the Civic (although don’t take that comparison too seriously, as these numbers only refer to below-the-windowline space and the ZR-V will have more of it above the roller cover). 

Numbers aside, the boot seems practical enough, with a flat floor and a panel that can flip up to form a divider; but it ought to do better. There is a little under-floor storage space, but you lose it in the case of upper-tier models, because of the premium audio system’s amplifier.

Fans of Honda’s Magic Seats (which flip up cinema-style to let you load tall items into the rear footwells) will be disappointed too. As with the Civic, Honda prioritised ride and handling, so used a multi-link rear axle instead of a more compact twist-beam one. That meant the fuel tank had to go in the usual spot under the rear bench, making the Magic Seats impossible. The smaller Jazz and HR-V are the only two cars in the line-up to still have them.

ENGINES & PERFORMANCE

7

Given that this car’s hybrid powertrain is lifted from the Civic, you might expect our comments on it in the ZR-V to be a case of 'see Civic review'. But that’s not the case, because two changes mean it’s not quite as impressive as in that car. 

First, the system has about 100kg more bulk to deal with here, so it doesn’t put on speed quite as effortlessly on part-throttle and doesn’t seem able to run in engine-off condition as often or for as long.

Honda makes most of its ADAS easy to switch off, but the speeding buzzer is an exception. It's not the most persistent, but in a week with the car, we couldn't find a way to deactivate it.

Outright performance is fine and feels like it’s present and correct relative to a circa-8.0sec 0-62mph sprint – although you do need to floor it and let the engine spin hard to access it.

Second, the ZR-V lacks some of the Civic’s digital noise reduction functionality, which might otherwise boost your perception of refinement. We've never remarked on it when reviewing the Civic, but without that system in place, the hybrid system does have more moments of thrashiness. In other words, when it’s working harder (which, thanks to the weight, it has more occasion to do), you notice that it is. 

The drive system also doesn’t behave quite as consistently as in the Civic, either. When you demand some acceleration, sometimes the ZR-V will deliver it smoothly and silently as the Civic usually does, but at other times the same throttle input will prompt the engine to rev – and, as noted, this can result in a slightly roused, angry tone. 

By making its family crossover so closely related to its family hatchback, then, Honda has set it up for some cruel comparisons. The ZR-V is a lot like the Civic but very slightly worse in every way. 

That’s predictable, of course, but other manufacturers have disguised that fact by differentiating their crossovers and hatchbacks more clearly – or indeed by axing the latter altogether.

RIDE & HANDLING

7

That brings us to pondering whether the ZR-V’s ride and handling is similarly compromised relative to the Civic’s standards - which itself is particularly practical family hatchback, of course.

There’s slightly better news to report here, because this is certainly a broadly comfortable-riding, assured-handling, fit-for-purpose family holdall. However, it doesn’t stand out as a more dynamic alternative to a more conventional SUV option.

The ZR-V handles with weighty, responsive steering and a limited but contained amount of body roll when cornering quickly. All models come on 18in wheels and have a moderate though reasonably well-balanced grip level on dry asphalt.

There's certainly less body movement on twisting roads than a higher-riding SUV might have and plenty of accuracy and security when carrying speed, although not enough to really engage you in what you’re doing. 

The ride is quiet, isolated and cushioned most of the time, although it has slightly leaden, clunky-feeling moments and seems to want for a little dexterous, progressive damper response over bigger inputs.

When cruising on the motorway, the ride is settled and comfortable but stops short of feeling particularly supple or absorptive.

MPG & RUNNING COSTS

7
honda zr v review 2023 01

The ZR-V clearly isn’t interested in competing with rivals at the value end of the SUV niche.

Prices for it start at only just under £40k for the Elegance grade. That's the same as the most expensive Renault Austral and not far off the most expensive Sportage Hybrid or Qashqai e-Power. Range-topping Advance trim, meanwhile, will set you back more than £43k.

Having said that, Honda buyers may not expect class-leading value from this car, since the Civic isn’t in that territory. Honda dealers, meanwhile, are aiming for higher-margin sales rather than outright volume, and the ZR-V’s fairly generous equipment levels and understated quality aura might just let them achieve those.

 

VERDICT

7

The ZR-V feels like an alternative, eclectic choice among more populist, conventional family SUVs, and its simplicity of operation and maturity of character are classically Honda in their flavour. But aside from that slightly leftfield positioning, it doesn’t really deliver a decisive advantage relative to rivals. It has strengths but nothing really convincing enough to make you wonder how its opposition can have been going about it so wrong for so long. 

It's certainly comfortable, has a solid-feeling, quite high-quality interior and has a hybrid powertrain that acquits it at least fairly well on outright performance and efficiency. It’s decent to drive without having any great potential to exceed your expectations.

But the versatility you expect of an SUV is in short supply here, thanks to a boot that lacks outright capacity, and a front-drive only powertrain.

The idea of a slightly bigger and more practical, jacked-up Civic might be an appealing one on paper, but in practice, the ZR-V doesn’t seem to have fully developed the potential of that idea.

Will Rimell

Will Rimell Autocar
Title: News editor

Will is Autocar's news editor.​ His focus is on setting Autocar's news agenda, interviewing top executives, reporting from car launches, and unearthing exclusives.

As part of his role, he also manages Autocar Business – the brand's B2B platform – and Haymarket's aftermarket publication CAT.

Illya Verpraet

Illya Verpraet Road Tester Autocar
Title: Road Tester

As a road tester, Illya drives everything from superminis to supercars, and writes reviews and comparison tests, while also managing the magazine’s Drives section. Much of his time is spent wrangling the data logger and wielding the tape measure to gather the data for Autocar’s in-depth instrumented road tests.

He loves cars that are fun and usable on the road – whether piston-powered or electric – or just cars that are very fit for purpose. When not in test cars, he drives an R53-generation Mini Cooper S.

Matt Saunders

Matt Saunders Autocar
Title: Road test editor

As Autocar’s chief car tester and reviewer, it’s Matt’s job to ensure the quality, objectivity, relevance and rigour of the entirety of Autocar’s reviews output, as well contributing a great many detailed road tests, group tests and drive reviews himself.

Matt has been an Autocar staffer since the autumn of 2003, and has been lucky enough to work alongside some of the magazine’s best-known writers and contributors over that time. He served as staff writer, features editor, assistant editor and digital editor, before joining the road test desk in 2011.

Since then he’s driven, measured, lap-timed, figured, and reported on cars as varied as the Bugatti Veyron, Rolls-Royce PhantomTesla RoadsterAriel Hipercar, Tata Nano, McLaren SennaRenault Twizy and Toyota Mirai. Among his wider personal highlights of the job have been covering Sebastien Loeb’s record-breaking run at Pikes Peak in 2013; doing 190mph on derestricted German autobahn in a Brabus Rocket; and driving McLaren’s legendary ‘XP5’ F1 prototype. His own car is a trusty Mazda CX-5.