Why we ran it: To see if a utility vehicle can also be an endearing everyday vehicle
Month 12 - Month 9 - Month 7 - Month 6 - Month 5 - Month 4 - Month 3 - Month 2 - Month 1 - Specs
Life with a Toyota Land Cruiser: Month 12
You really get under a car’s skin after a 38,000-mile year. So what’s the verdict? - 25th September 2019
I know there’s a new Land Rover Defender, and very nice it is too (or isn’t, depending on your outlook), but spare a thought for the forgotten 4x4, won’t you?
The Toyota Land Cruiser 3dr does what a new Defender 90 will do – perhaps more, perhaps less – and, while it’s at it, costs a lot less money and looks a lot more like Wile E Coyote’s head. Yet nobody seems to care about it like they do the Defender. I do. I’ve been running a Land Cruiser since this time last year.
This grey one, in very base Utility specification, at £33,995 plus only metallic paint, arrived from Toyota with just over 150 miles on the clock and has just returned to its maker (sob, sniff, etc) 38,000 miles later. All but 2000 of those have been added by me. I’ve driven more miles in this Land Cruiser than I have in probably any other car, ever; maybe excepting my own Land Rover Defender, which I’ve owned for seven years.
One of the reasons is simple: I’ve had a lot of places to go. But the other reason is that the Land Cruiser has slipped into my life so completely painlessly that, even for a car with big intentions and capabilities when it comes to off-roading, it’s actually a very straightforward family/ commuter car.
Let’s cover the everyday stuff first, then. The Toyota has five seats, good head and leg room in all, and the rear seat backs can be reclined. You can fit a good amount of luggage behind them in position – 380 litres – but they split and tumble forward to leave a decent cargo area, albeit with a high load height because of the offroad credentials and with a rear door that opens sideways, not upwards, because the rear door can be a spare wheel carrier. The rear window hinges up separately.
Road refinement and comfort – not something you’d always associate with a rufty-tufty separate-chassis 4x4 – is good. A colleague described the way the Land Cruiser rides on a motorway as lolling like the bottom jaw of a chewing cow. Slight exaggeration, but I know what he means: the Land Cruiser is a car of slow, steady movements, a soft ride and big cornering lean.
Join the debate
Add your comment
SWB Landcruiser Utility.
There can be no direct comparison with Land Rover's here (and I've had my fair share in the past: 88, Defender, Discovery etc) - when I went for a SWB 2004 Shogun commercial for towing and boat launching, and a 2002 SWB 2.0 D4D RAV as a cheap all-weather run-about: - I am smitten on Japanese 4x4's now. I have been astonished with just how tough and low maintenance they are. I now view the Land Cruiser as the "thinking man's Land Rover" these days and a SWB Utility is definately next on my list. Its a triumph that you can still get such a car with relatively little to go wrong on it (I am not a fan of all the latest gadgetry, less is more as far as I am concerned). The only reason I haven't got one already is demand for used examples: only high mileage cars with high residual values ever tend to come to market. This is testament to how good these cars are. Thanks to Matt Prior for his detailed log on living with the car - its been really interesting and confirmed a few reasons why this car is next on my list (AdBlue is a pain though - not someting I've had to live with yet having run older diesels up until now - but that's eco-progress I guess).
I shall miss reading about
I shall miss reading about the Landcruiser. Its far more appealing than any of the more more popular faux 4x4 that everyone else wants. Having a manual box is very appealing, having a diesel much less so. I imagine it comes with a suitable petrol V6 in other markets.
Matt, perhaps you could try and get hold of a Wrangler for the next 12 months, they appear to have just introduced a 'Sport' spec which knocks £5k off the price making it just under £40k (still not a Landcruiser like bargain though). It would make an interesting comparison.
One other point, its really good to see you testing the vehicle over 12 months and so many miles. If there were any niggles they are sure to show up. So much better than the 4 or 6 month tests some other ' long termers' go through, where the new car sheen can hardly have worn off before its time to give it back
Nice. The opposite of a
Nice. The opposite of a (probably) unreliable Velar SVAD